> So I ask again - does anyone see any issues with the 
> fragments being used like this:
>       http://openid.net/pipermail/specs/2007-May/001767.html  

Seems reasonable in essence. But it adds complexity and
removes some immediacy of URL identifiers-as-is.

Do fragments need special handling just to handle id 
recycling risks?

I'm probably missing some context, but can't the issuing OP 
make sure to issue unique IDs, like http://example.com/user1234 
instead of http://example.com/user#1234 ?  

specs mailing list

Reply via email to