Michiel,
I don't disagree with your argument, there are shortcomings in every area that you
mention and we have pointed this out to the development team as I am sure you have. I
think they are seriously trying to improve all of these areas in the Dharma release.
>From the perspective of a user, a 3 second wait to generate a workflow is not a big
>deal IMHO, although I agree that really shouldn't take that long. Applying object
>security on the otherhand is a whole other story as you well know.
Lanny Udey
Hofstra University
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, April 19, 2001 >>>
> Since this was the only problem we had with workflows I was just
> throwing this out as a possibility - for us 3 secs to create a
> workflow is not a big deal.
Surely you are joking. A core spectra functionality should never take 3
seconds. This is ridiculous. Spectra is supposed to be fast, scalable,
with a myriad of ready-to-use components. It appears to me that in fact
most components are so buggy or slow that they are unusable (SLM,
workflows, userprofiles, siteminder security, webtop, etc)
I do like the overall coapi idea but I'm getting just a little bit annoyed
by how many times a spectra feature that looks neat at first glance just
falls apart when it is actually used.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
