CommonSpot? The Figleaf guys could tell you much more about it.



Bob Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/06/2003 12:45 PM
Please respond to spectra-talk

 
        To:     Spectra-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        cc: 
        Subject:        RE: Spectra Trial

How about a somewhat natural path, one based on Cold Fusion? Anyone have 
any
ideas on that? I would like to stay with Cold Fusion if possible...

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Spectra-Talk
Subject: RE: Spectra Trial


I'm not certain that there is a natural upgrade path between any content 
management systems. That is just the path which people are trying to put 
in front of us, even though it will cost millions of dollars when 
everything is said and done. 




Bob Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/06/2003 11:51 AM
Please respond to spectra-talk

 
        To:     Spectra-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        cc: 
        Subject:        RE: Spectra Trial

Is Interwoven a natural upgrade path from Spectra?


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:23 AM
To: Spectra-Talk
Subject: RE: Spectra Trial


I haven't heard any rumors, nor am I trying to start any. It is just a 
wish. Maybe someone at MM is listening? We would love to be able to 
(within license) extend the codebase, redo everything with CFC's and have 
our own installer package. Not for resale, but for internal use within our 


company. In fact, we would most likely be willing to pay MM for the right 
to do so, or buy licenses for additional copies to stay legal. It would 
still be significantly cheaper than switching to Interwoven, which is what 


higher-ups here are pushing. 






"Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/06/2003 10:54 AM
Please respond to spectra-talk

 
        To:     Spectra-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        cc: 
        Subject:        RE: Spectra Trial

do you think that will happen? we have asked for that for ages!?

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 February 2003 15:38
To: Spectra-Talk
Subject: RE: Spectra Trial


Totally agree on SiteMinder, huge mistake for MM. 

I think the biggest error they made was how Spectra was marketed and 
pricing. Look at how much the competing products cost, for example 
Interwoven. Spectra was too cheap to be perceived as a player in content 
management. If they set the code free to customers maybe it could end up 
being something really solid. 






Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/06/2003 10:32 AM
Please respond to spectra-talk

 
        To:     Spectra-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        cc: 
        Subject:        RE: Spectra Trial

> My point was about Figleaf bashing something that they 
> still offer paid training for.

I apologize. It wasn't my intent to bash Spectra per se, and I don't speak
for Fig Leaf Software in that regard.

> I like and respect Dave and Steve a great deal, but 
> remember how Figleaf aggressively pushed Spectra to 
> clients when it came out. We were one of those who 
> shelled out money for the product, training and 
> consulting services, based on their glowing 
> recommendations.

Well, to be perfectly honest, the way I see it is that Spectra had the
makings of a potentially great product. To elaborate a bit, I think that 
for
a product of that complexity, it usually takes a couple of major versions 
to
get where you really want to go in the long run. When I looked at the
initial version, I thought "this will be really great by, say, version 3".
In that case, it makes sense to start using it, and as it gets better, you
get the benefits of that improvement. At the time, I thought it was as 
good
or better than competing products, and would be even better in the future.
Of course, that isn't how things worked out, but that was certainly my
expectation at the time.

So, anyway, I'm sorry for making a smart remark off-the-cuff; I just 
figured
there were enough SiteMinder veterans who felt the same way, I guess.

Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444








______________________________________________________________________
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

                        
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe visit 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk or send a 
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.

Reply via email to