As of right now, you would need to buy the license for the new box. Not sure what is being planned for the future. My connection to Macromedia is no more (see .sig), I only run the site and manage the code base.
======================================================================= Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Mindseye, Inc Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus Yahoo IM : morpheus "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:32 AM > To: Spectra-Talk > Subject: RE: Spectra Trial > > > Yeah, we're already doing that. We'd like to be able to create new > installs though. > > > > > "Raymond Camden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 02/06/2003 11:48 AM > Please respond to spectra-talk > > > To: Spectra-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: > Subject: RE: Spectra Trial > > You do know that you can do whatever you want on the box that > has the license, right? So you could extend/modify/etc - and > if you keep it on the same box that legally has Spectra, it's ok. > > ============================================================== > ========= > Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Mindseye, Inc > > Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > WWW : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus > Yahoo IM : morpheus > > "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:23 AM > > To: Spectra-Talk > > Subject: RE: Spectra Trial > > > > > > I haven't heard any rumors, nor am I trying to start any. It > > is just a > > wish. Maybe someone at MM is listening? We would love to be able to > > (within license) extend the codebase, redo everything with > > CFC's and have > > our own installer package. Not for resale, but for internal > > use within our > > company. In fact, we would most likely be willing to pay MM > > for the right > > to do so, or buy licenses for additional copies to stay > > legal. It would > > still be significantly cheaper than switching to Interwoven, > > which is what > > higher-ups here are pushing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 02/06/2003 10:54 AM > > Please respond to spectra-talk > > > > > > To: Spectra-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > cc: > > Subject: RE: Spectra Trial > > > > do you think that will happen? we have asked for that for ages!? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 06 February 2003 15:38 > > To: Spectra-Talk > > Subject: RE: Spectra Trial > > > > > > Totally agree on SiteMinder, huge mistake for MM. > > > > I think the biggest error they made was how Spectra was marketed and > > pricing. Look at how much the competing products cost, for example > > Interwoven. Spectra was too cheap to be perceived as a player > > in content > > management. If they set the code free to customers maybe it > > could end up > > being something really solid. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 02/06/2003 10:32 AM > > Please respond to spectra-talk > > > > > > To: Spectra-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > cc: > > Subject: RE: Spectra Trial > > > > > My point was about Figleaf bashing something that they > still offer > > > paid training for. > > > > I apologize. It wasn't my intent to bash Spectra per se, and > > I don't speak for Fig Leaf Software in that regard. > > > > > I like and respect Dave and Steve a great deal, but remember how > > > Figleaf aggressively pushed Spectra to clients when it > came out. We > > > were one of those who shelled out money for the product, training > > > and consulting services, based on their glowing > > > recommendations. > > > > Well, to be perfectly honest, the way I see it is that > > Spectra had the makings of a potentially great product. To > > elaborate a bit, I think that > > for > > a product of that complexity, it usually takes a couple of > > major versions > > to > > get where you really want to go in the long run. When I > > looked at the initial version, I thought "this will be really > > great by, say, version 3". In that case, it makes sense to > > start using it, and as it gets better, you get the benefits > > of that improvement. At the time, I thought it was as > > good > > or better than competing products, and would be even better > > in the future. Of course, that isn't how things worked out, > > but that was certainly my expectation at the time. > > > > So, anyway, I'm sorry for making a smart remark off-the-cuff; I just > > figured > > there were enough SiteMinder veterans who felt the same > way, I guess. > > > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software > > http://www.figleaf.com/ > > voice: (202) 797-5496 > > fax: (202) 797-5444 > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/spectra_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
