I would say your are comparing apples and pears. If Microsoft say that SCOM can do everything Spectrum does (except fauklt isolation), then YOU SHOULD DROP THEIR CALL, CAUSE THEY ARE LYING. Well, except for the fundamental idea that anything based on software CAN be reprogrammed todo anything. But looking at the two as designed, then MS is lying.
Spectrum is in core a network management tool which has been expanded todo more. SCOM is a system mamangement tool expanded todo more. It’s a fundamental difference between these two. Trying to expand into network management is a trillion times more complicated than expand into systems management. But of course if you only "ping" your network, its another deal. But then you probably should look at opensource alternatives instead. Like Nagois (http://www.nagios.org/) My two cents /Roberth -----Original Message----- From: Murtey, Patrick [mailto:pmur...@mgmresorts.com] Sent: den 2 juli 2014 22:19 To: spectrum Subject: [spectrum] scom and spectrum Hi All, We are looking for those of you out there that have had experience with scom2012. Can you tell us what the major differences between scom2012 and Spectrum? Like what does one do better than the other? Pros and cons ( aside from fault isolation, which I don't believe anybody else does) . Thank you very much Patrick --- To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to lists...@unc.edu with the body: unsubscribe spectrum roberth.edb...@seb.se --- To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to lists...@unc.edu with the body: unsubscribe spectrum arch...@mail-archive.com
