--- In [email protected], "Mike Bennett" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That's correct. Can you write it as a concise formula?
> 
> .50 + (.50*.50) = .75
> 
> Px + (Pnotx*Py) = .75
> where P is probability
> 
> Is that right at least? :)


Yep. Can you also show a concise formula for three things, i.e. x, y 
and z?


> > > 7/8 * 31/108 .251
> > > 5/6 * 51/648 .065
> > > 26/27 * 9/24 .574
> > > 11/12 * 7/24 .267
> > > ------------ ----
> > >              1.16
> > > So, dividing 41% by 1.16 we get ~35%.
> > 
> > Hmm, that stuff looks like mystery to me :-)
> > Where do you get all those numbers like 648 from?
> > 
> > Cheers!
> > Stefan
> 
> The first numbers were all the probabilities of not getting a skip 
in
> a particular step, the second numbers are the probabilities of 
getting
>  a skip in the other steps


Those second numbers are computed with your initial wrong method, 
though :-). Try answering the x/y/z question above first.


> The 648 was a common denominator (read: I
> was too lazy to find a nicer common multiple for 24 and 27).


Hehe, there's a real nice way to find the least common multiple, 
worthwile to find it :-)

Cheers!
Stefan






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to