> Gilles does E2 M E2 in a second and I just did (U2 M2 U2 M')*2 in 1.07
> seconds. I just don't get it why you prefer that longer and slower
alg...
I use it because it's faster for me, personally. I'm not forcing you
to use it, use whichever you prefer. Gawd...
> Also, do you use non-matching blocks? I'm having a load of difficulty
> making sense out of Thom's post about them. Am I missing something
> really easy?
Yeah, I didn't really explain it well at all, but I don't know how to
explain it better... The main method I use solves them in two steps.
Because I use the block upside down when I create non-mathing blocks,
I see the green and blue as one colour and fix the orientation of
them, that bit is really not that hard. Then the permutation you look
for the arrangement of the green/blue corners pieces, and act
accordingly looking at my post.
I'll get some U graphs up to explain what I mean, is there an easy way
of generating them or do I have to GIMP it up? Someone should make
U-face pics imagecube-style.
TODO: Explain non-mathing blocks better.
;)
~Thom
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
