The is exactly the way that I memorize when doing blindfold. I just
visualize the patch of the cycles, no conversion. I'm slow, about 5
minutes average, but that's because I suck. I know with practice it
could be a lot easier.
-Chris
On 3/3/06, Ryan Heise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been reading the various threads about memorisation, and have to
> wonder what is appealing about translating information from one domain
> into a completely unrelated domain in order to memorise it.
>
> We have discussed memorising a cube using numbers, sentences and cards.
> Why not memorise the direct visual imagery that we get by looking at the
> cube? With training it should be possible to form memory associations
> based on the spatial relativity of same-coloured facelets, and observe
> shape outlines formed by these sets of facelets. This is how our brains
> are natively wired to perform visual analysis, anyway.
>
> By the way, a sequence of 4 random chords (4 notes each) constrained to
> a range of just 2 octaves, contains more data than a single random cube
> position (if you only care about the data that allows you to solve the
> cube). If you can see visual patterns to the same extent that musicians
> hear auditory patterns, then a single random cube shouldn't take more
> than a few seconds to memorise.
>
> Ryan
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/speedsolvingrubikscube/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
