Hello Edouard, > I guess the sourceforge anonymous cvs is still in a pity state and > lagging way behind the developer cvs access. > > This patch was already applied with the changes I listed. It was not a > patch modification request but a report. Let's blame sourceforge that > made you loose time on this.
It's not that bad. Maybe you didn't change the declaration of lbuf to use ATM_CELL_TOTAL_SIZE yet, and there are other changes I mentioned that were not in the patch I submitted to CVS. > The changes may show up in the anonymous cvs soon[1]. Ok. Did you also apply the changes you mentioned yesterday (fe using parameters from atm.h)? Note that the merging of the two if (pti == 1) 's is probably still a good idea, as well as the combination of the nb_cells and num_bytes_new calculation. If you send me a g/bzipped tarball of the current state of CVS I will apply these changes to that. Or you'll have to wait until anonymous CVS gets updated and I can patch against that. If I didn't oversee anything that should wrap up this thread. Bye, Leonard. -- How clean is a war when you shoot around nukelar waste? Stop the use of depleted uranium ammo! End all weapons of mass destruction. Liste de diffusion modem ALCATEL SpeedTouch USB Pour se d�sinscrire : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
