-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Julian Mehnle wrote on spf-council: > [...] > For contact form submissions, another factor comes into play: > confidentiality. We cannot generally assume permission to make contact > form submissions public, so contact form submissions that end up as > moderation requests on one of the public mailing lists should _not_ be > approved unless it is clear that the submitter would not object. > > At least that is _my_ opinion. > > The more important issue however is how to fine-tune the contact form. > [...]
Today I extended the website contact form[1] with an option that allows submitters to select whether their messages should be treated confiden- tially (e.g. for embarassing support requests) or may be discussed publicly (e.g. for website suggestions). (See r16/17 in svn:spf-website [2].) I decided to NOT give the selector a default selection of "may not" (or "may") in order to make submitters actually _think_ about what they want. Otherwise we might end up with 95% or so confidential submissions where most really wouldn't have to be. References: 1. http://new.openspf.org/Contact 2. http://new.openspf.org/source/spf-website?rev=16&view=rev -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEgI9iwL7PKlBZWjsRAqa6AJ4lCzKL+bL3VFDR6UE3/jq28nFimACg8O49 bQOSFy5LhzBH2JvVrk7wS+Y= =77MD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
