Georg Brandl wrote: > Now, finding a new name for "class" is hard. > > Looking at Python naming tradition, both "type" and "classobj" would be > candidates. "klass" is also commonly used when a Python identifier is > called for, but of these, only "classobj" would be possible I think. > > Other similar suggestions have been "concrete-class" (together with a new > "abstract-class"), "sclass", "pclass", and "cls".
"apiclass", perhaps? -- --Max Battcher-- http://worldmaker.net --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
