On May 13, 2009, at 3:31 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> > Looking at Python naming tradition, both "type" and "classobj" would > be > candidates. "klass" is also commonly used when a Python identifier is > called for, but of these, only "classobj" would be possible I think. "classobj" is good, but why is it the only one "possible"? Doug --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
