Doug Hellmann schrieb: > > On May 13, 2009, at 3:31 AM, Georg Brandl wrote: > >> >> Looking at Python naming tradition, both "type" and "classobj" would >> be >> candidates. "klass" is also commonly used when a Python identifier is >> called for, but of these, only "classobj" would be possible I think. > > "classobj" is good, but why is it the only one "possible"?
Well, "type" may be correct for Python, but it is far from the traditional "class". "klass" may be fine in code, but it doesn't read well in documents (people will wonder if it's misspelled). All IMO, of course. Georg --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
