On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:47:14PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > IMHO it is better to have ep93xx implementation on its own driver since it > > is > > not a real AMBA PL022 peripheral but some weird hack made by Cirrus > > (although > > my opinions are bit biased). > > I disagree because it's IMO at first sight no more deviant than our "PL023" > variants that still use the same pl022 driver.
Ok. Do you think that we can go forward with this patch series if I drop the last patch (spi/ep93xx: add DMA support)? This way we will have dmaengine implementation in place, whatever SPI driver we choose to use with ep93xx. We can then try to use amba-pl022 driver with ep93xx and see if it works or not, and how much work is needed. I would like some comments from Hartley and Ryan also. > Is there some inexepensive hardware with EP93xx I can get to fix this > myself? Check for example Technologic Systems (embeddedarm.com), I have their TS-7260 board which has ep9302. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
