On Thursday, May 26, 2011 11:38 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:15:25AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Mika Westerberg <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Do you think that we can go forward with this patch series if I drop the >>> last >>> patch (spi/ep93xx: add DMA support)? This way we will have dmaengine >>> implementation in place, whatever SPI driver we choose to use with ep93xx. >> >> Yes and you don't have to drop any DMA support for the existing driver >> for me alone, now that it's in the tree it should be maintained. I only >> wanted to raise the issue of code duplication, not block any patches. > > Ok, so I'll keep the last patch for now. > > BTW: if we get amba-pl022 driver to work with ep93xx, do you have any ideas > how to proceed from there? I mean, should we convert existing users to use > that driver instead and finally remove the ep93xx_spi driver?
I think the biggest hurdle with using the amba-pl022 driver is that the ep93xx spi peripheral does not have the registers with the pid and cid id's. Without those I don't think the amba bus driver will be able to match the device to the driver. Regards, Hartley ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
