That's exactly what I thought....
Then last year I changed my spit with narrow drive shafts ie high ride
height/toe in - bottom of the wheels were well in ie \ / - this had
been incorrect for 10 years (having put in a new spring) to long drive
shafts and it went to near perfect ie l l -!
Go figure!
On 8/4/2010 10:21 AM, Andrew Mace wrote:
The spring doesn't "care" how wide the rear track is, since the vertical links
pivot on their trunnions -- or SHOULD pivot on their trunnions. Perhaps seized
trunnion bushes in the vertical link/hub assembly is part of a problem?
--Andy Mace
*Mrs Irrelevant: Oh, is it a jet?
*Man: Well, no ... It's not so much of a jet, it's more your, er, Triumph
Herald engine with wings.
-- Cut-price Airlines Sketch, Monty Python's Flying Circus (22)
Triumph 10 / Herald / Sports 6 vehicle consultant, The Vintage Triumph
Register: http://www.vtr.org
Check out the North American Triumph Sports 6 (Vitesse 6) and Triumph Herald
Database: http://triumph-herald.us
-----Original Message-----
From: Cleobury Phil<[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, Aug 4, 2010 9:08 am
Subject: Re: [Spits] Rear spring with too much arch
Possibly a long drive shaft spring from a 1500.
Two drive shafts on a Mk IV (mostly short)and 1500 (long) 1 inch difference
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation $11.47
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/spitfires/[email protected]
--
Regards
Cleobury P
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation $11.47
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/spitfires/[email protected]
