=======================================================
-> This is The 'SPORRS' Mailing List
-> Info File: http://www.anet-stl.com/acphotog/sporrs/infosporrs.htm
-> Note: Remember to include your name in each list post or reply.
-> Please delete all unnecessary quoted text from the original message!
=======================================================

Bill Maltby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) was saying something along these 
lines:

>I was wondering if anyone on the list had a preference for a
>particular type of focusing screen. I have been using the
>one that came standard on the camera for years but it is
>getting scratched so I was thinking about a replacement. I
>have been thinking of one with grid lines on it as a
>possible aid in eliminating my constant problem of not
>having the camera horizontal. On my cameras (Canon F1) the
>focusing screen also affects the metering pattern. Any
>thoughts on focusing screens? Any thoughts on cleaning them?

Bill,

I've used F-1s for years and years, and have taken good advantage of the 
interchangeable screens. In the past, my favorites used to be the Bright 
Laser Matte (Screen AJ & SJ) with no focusing aids at all. They were 
incredibly bright, eliminated the problem of microprisms blacking out at 
low light, and both were a big help back when the majority of my lenses 
were slow zooms. I have used both the averaging metering pattern and the 
spot metering pattern and have alwyas been pleased with the accuracy of 
both. The F-1 screens used to be really expensive, but as the whole FD 
system fades in to the orangy sunset, most of the more esoteric 
accessories have dropped in price.

I would think that the grid pattern could help, but you'd have to be 
careful what you choose to align with. We've all seen that signal mast or 
code line pole that sits on the edge of the frame ... and is leaning to 
one side or the other. Those always drive me nuts, and they can really 
make a scene look off kilter.

These days, I have the standard AE (averaging meter, split 
image/microprism focusing) screen loaded in both my cameras, and I carry 
the SJ (spotmetering/bright laser matte) screen in my bag if I should 
decide I need it. The metering patterns have become less important to me 
over the years, as I've gotten used to judging light on my own. The 
focusing patterns have become MORE important to me, as my eyesight ain't 
what it used to be! Plus, now that my lenses are faster on the whole, I 
don't have the problem of the focusing aids blacking out. Even the 
standard F-1 focusing screens are incredibly bright, anyway. They will 
spoil you. I look through other people's viewfinders and feel like I'm 
wearing sunglasses.

Cleaning is an incredibly tricky issue. The best thing to clean a 
focusing screen is a small, soft sable artist's brush. They're small 
enough that you can fish out little specks of dust out of the  corners of 
the screen. (Which invariably happens with removable-prism cameras).

Resist the urge to do any more cleaning to the focusing screen. If you 
have an accident and really smudge one, you can clean the top with a lens 
tissue rolled into a little point, and a VERY SMALL amount of high-grade 
cleaning fluid, applied to the tissue. Never apply fluid directly to the 
screen, and never try to clean the fresnel side with anything other than 
a dry brush. The F-1 screens are actually two parts of glass sandwiched 
together, and if you dump fluid on the screen, it will seep in between 
the layers and ruin the screen. And since that's where the beam-splitter 
is (which directs the appropriate amount of the view to the metering 
cells) it would undoubtedly affect the meter's accuracy as well.

Hope this big long ramble helps,

Scott



Scott Withrow
Terre Haute, Indiana (more or less)
http://www.railcenter.com


=======================================================
-> SPORRS: 'Serious Photographers Of Railroad Related Subjects'
-> Web Site: http://www.anet-stl.com/acphotog/sporrs/
-> Message © 1998 SPORRS® - All Rights Reserved
=======================================================


Reply via email to