On Mar 28, 2014, at 10:45 PM, Hannes Gredler wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 09:42:20PM +0100, Robert Raszuk wrote: > | [ ... ] > | So there are two options: > | > | - add minor extensions to IPv6 dataplane which can provide control and > | encapsulation in a very smooth and gradual way for a number of > | applications > > those are by no means "minor extensions" - those are "major, intrusive > changes which often require hardware re-spins and expensive upgrade cycles"
I don't think the above statement reflects the entire HW industry. s. > | - rework, implement and deploy entire load of MPLS control plane to > | support IPv6 bearing in mind that MPLS does not have real NNI so at > | best it's applicability is limited to closed domains under same > | administration > > just curious - whats wrong with BGP-LU, BGP-LS as a NNI protocol ? > _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
