Hi Peter, On 8/19/15, 12:01 PM, "Peter Psenak" <[email protected]> wrote:
>SR protocol extensions clearly do - they advertise MTID with the prefix >SID, not with SRGB. > [Pushpasis] Do you mean that a separate index per topology is mandatory? That won¹t be a good idea in my opinion. Operators SHOULD have flexibility to choose a separate or same index for the same prefix under different topology. Not sure how other members (especially the operators) think about the same. Request SR authors to re-consider this. Thanks -Pushpasis > _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
