Hi Peter, Inline comments
Stephane -----Original Message----- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 09:53 To: LITKOWSKI Stephane SCE/IBNF; Pushpasis Sarkar; Eric Rosen; SPRING WG Subject: Re: [spring] SRGBs, indexes, and topologies within a domain Stephane, there are two things involved here - configuration and advertisement. If you look at the SR drafts for both IGPs, both MTID and algorithm is advertised with Prefix SID, not with SRGB. [SLI] Agree that this is the way today. That does not mean you have to manually configure prefix SID for each MTID or algorithm - there are ways how this can be achieved in an automated way while advertising a single topology/algorithm agnostic SRGB. [SLI] Could you precise how you will do it ? Because using an offset as already proposed causes some collision or unusable indexes within the range. Something else in mind ? thanks, Peter _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
