Stephane,

there are two things involved here - configuration and advertisement.

If you look at the SR drafts for both IGPs, both MTID and algorithm is advertised with Prefix SID, not with SRGB.

That does not mean you have to manually configure prefix SID for each MTID or algorithm - there are ways how this can be achieved in an automated way while advertising a single topology/algorithm agnostic SRGB.

thanks,
Peter


On 8/19/15 09:36 , [email protected] wrote:
Hi,

We come back to the same discussion for MT as for per algorithm SRGB. Do we 
need for operational reason the same index value to be configured for different 
algorithm or topologies ?
IMO, it is useful operationally otherwise adding a topology or algorithm would 
be painful ... Adding a new index value is like assigning a new prefix but here 
we want to use the same prefix.

Stephane

-----Original Message-----
From: spring [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pushpasis Sarkar
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 09:06
To: Peter Psenak; Eric Rosen; SPRING WG
Subject: Re: [spring] SRGBs, indexes, and topologies within a domain

Hi Peter,

On 8/19/15, 12:01 PM, "Peter Psenak" <[email protected]> wrote:

SR protocol extensions clearly do - they advertise MTID with the prefix
SID, not with SRGB.

[Pushpasis] Do you mean that a separate index per topology is mandatory?
That won¹t be a good idea in my opinion. Operators SHOULD have flexibility to 
choose a separate or same index for the same prefix under different topology. 
Not sure how other members (especially the operators) think about the same. 
Request SR authors to re-consider this.

Thanks
-Pushpasis



_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

.


_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to