Hi Peter, On 8/19/15, 6:15 PM, "Peter Psenak" <[email protected]> wrote:
>I'm not sure we want to advertise redundant data to allow more >configuration flexibility. From both architecture and encoding >perspective it's preferable to pick single approach. And it looks like >to me one has been picked already by both architecture and encoding. [Pushpasis] I think that¹s what Eric and myself has been trying to say.. Whatever the architecture and the encoding has picked does not seem to be enough. :) Again I will wait for others to chime in and let us know if they need this change or not. > >>Also the MTID is not attached to the prefix-SID but the >>prefix with which the SID-index is attached. > >In OSPF we took an approach of advertising the prefix once and encode >MTID in each attribute. So in OSPF MTID it is attached to Prefix SID. >ISIS uses different approach, where prefix as such is advertised for >each MTID independently with all the MTID specific attributes. [Pushpasis] Yes, I am aware of that :) Thanks -Pushpasis > _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
