Hi Les,
On 8/26/15, 7:13 AM, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[email protected]> wrote: >[Les:] Topology specific SRGBs requires a specification change for the IGPs. >The new advertisements are NOT backwards compatible w existing >implementations. So we cannot simply say "do what you please". >Peter has repeatedly made this point - and also pointed out that since the >prefix advertisements as currently defined in the IGP drafts includes topology >identifiers including the topology identifier in the SRGB advertisement is >redundant. [Pushpasis] Why not add a MT-SR_Capability Sub/TLV then? That way it won’t break backward compatibility? Thanks -Pushpasis _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
