Hi Pushpasis,

I just want to remember that the discussion is not only for MT, but there was 
also a thread for per algorithm SRGB (as presented in Prague). IMO, there must 
be some consistency in the choice we do.
Regarding encoding nothing is impossible (as example a new subTLV can be 
created ensuring backward compatibility).
I would say let's first have a consensus of what is good to do independently of 
the encoding. 

Best Regards,

-----Original Message-----
From: Pushpasis Sarkar [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 07:36
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Uma Chunduri; LITKOWSKI Stephane SCE/IBNF; Peter 
Psenak (ppsenak); Eric Rosen; SPRING WG
Subject: Re: [spring] SRGBs, indexes, and topologies within a domain

Hi Les,




On 8/26/15, 7:13 AM, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[email protected]> wrote:

>[Les:] Topology specific SRGBs requires a specification change for the IGPs. 
>The new advertisements are NOT backwards compatible w existing 
>implementations. So we cannot simply say "do what you please". 
>Peter has repeatedly made this point - and also pointed out that since the 
>prefix advertisements as currently defined in the IGP drafts includes topology 
>identifiers including the topology identifier in the SRGB advertisement is 
>redundant.
[Pushpasis] Why not add a MT-SR_Capability Sub/TLV then? That way it won’t 
break backward compatibility? 

Thanks
-Pushpasis

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to