The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8355,
"Resiliency Use Cases in Source Packet Routing in Networking (SPRING) Networks".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5380

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported by: James Bensley <[email protected]>
Date Reported: 2018-06-06
Rejected by: Martin Vigoureux (IESG)

Section: 3.2

Original Text
-------------
An alternative protection strategy consists in management-free local
   protection that is aimed at providing a repair for the destination
   based on the shortest path to the destination.

Corrected Text
--------------
An alternative protection strategy exists in management-free local
 protection

Notes
-----

 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
No justification given to justify the need for the change.

--------------------------------------
RFC8355 (draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-12)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Resiliency Use Cases in Source Packet Routing in 
Networking (SPRING) Networks
Publication Date    : March 2018
Author(s)           : C. Filsfils, Ed., S. Previdi, Ed., B. Decraene, R. Shakir
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Source Packet Routing in Networking
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to