+1 From: spring [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Luis M. Contreras Sent: Friday, August 6, 2021 9:07 PM To: Boris Hassanov <[email protected]> Cc: SPRING WG List <[email protected]>; Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
+1 Best regards Luis El vie., 6 ago. 2021 19:12, Boris Hassanov <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> escribió: Hi Joel and all, Please see my answer and comments below. >Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for compressing >SRv6 information? Yes, we should pick up one data plane SRv6 compression mechanism. Even if It will be not an easy choice. I have been on vendors side for a while but now saying from operator perspective: we need one standardized solution because we do not want to stuck with just one vendor and do not want to solve an interop nightmare between 2 or 3 different mechanisms from different vendors by ourselves in the nearest future. With all respect for the all vendors who invested much in particular technology. SY, Boris On Wednesday, August 4, 2021, 09:52:48 PM GMT+3, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts on the requirements and analysis drafts. The question of how the working group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic for a separate email a bit later. Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and the perspectives being expressed. While the topic was well-raised, the discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to everyone what the purpose is. In particular, the chairs have decided to re-ask the question. We ask that even those who have responded in the discussion respond to this thread. Preferably with both what their opinion is and an explanation of why. The question we are asking you to comment on is: Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for compressing SRv6 information? Please speak up. We are looking to collect responses until close of business PDT on 20-August-2021. Thank you, Joel, Jim, and Bruno _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
