Hi, folks, As one member of design team, I am pleased that two drafts has been produced by the members with more than 1 year effort. Support has also been received from outside of the DT during the past year, thanks. From the perspective of one operator, I believe that the standardization of one data plane for compressed SRv6 will be better for the whole industry.
Best regards Chongfeng > 2021年8月5日 上午2:52，Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> 写道： > > The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts on > the requirements and analysis drafts. The question of how the working group > wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic for a separate > email a bit later. > > Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and the > perspectives being expressed. While the topic was well-raised, the > discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to > everyone what the purpose is. In particular, the chairs have decided to > re-ask the question. We ask that even those who have responded in the > discussion respond to this thread. Preferably with both what their opinion > is and an explanation of why. > > The question we are asking you to comment on is: > > Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for compressing > SRv6 information? > > Please speak up. We are looking to collect responses until close of business > PDT on 20-August-2021. > > Thank you, > Joel, Jim, and Bruno > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
