Dear Chairs

+1 on the high cost to implementations of multiple SRv6 compression
solutions and major issue for operators on interoperability.

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 9:16 PM Dongjie (Jimmy) <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear chairs,
>
> I believe the WG should standardize a single data plane solution.
>
> I fully agree with Dhruv that the cost of multiple data plane for SRv6
> compression would be unaffordable and the interoperable deployment would
> suffer from it.
>
> Best regards,
> Jie
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: spring [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James
> Guichard
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 4:28 AM
> > To: Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
> >
> > Dear WG:
> >
> > If you have not already done so please do provide your comments to the
> > mailing list as soon as possible.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Jim, Joel & Bruno
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: spring <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 2:52 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
> >
> > The SPRING Working Group Chairs thank the design team for their efforts
> on
> > the requirements and analysis drafts.  The question of how the working
> > group wants to progress that part of the work will be the topic for a
> separate
> > email a bit later.
> >
> > Right now, we are hearing the discussion about how many solutions, and
> the
> > perspectives being expressed.  While the topic was well-raised, the
> > discussion to date has not been structured in a way that makes clear to
> > everyone what the purpose is.  In particular, the chairs have decided to
> > re-ask the question.  We ask that even those who have responded in the
> > discussion respond to this thread.  Preferably with both what their
> opinion
> > is and an explanation of why.
> >
> > The question we are asking you to comment on is:
> >
> > Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for
> > compressing SRv6 information?
> >
> > Please speak up.  We are looking to collect responses until close of
> business
> > PDT on 20-August-2021.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Joel, Jim, and Bruno
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spring mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww
> > w.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fspring&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cjames.
> > n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C250776c6aff74c568c8a08d957790ab9%7C
> > 0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637636999654946952
> > %7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL
> > CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=JyUjJng7gmClXGUs
> > Ll9AV6YWYWLQUFpmTPud8%2F0LRWE%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spring mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email [email protected] <[email protected]>*



*M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to