Dear chairs and the WG, I agree with assessment of Haoyu Song (in his Shepherd role). I also think that the document should progress as "Standards Track”.
Thanks Regards … Zafar From: Alvaro Retana <[email protected]> Date: Friday, October 2, 2026 at 2:40 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; spring-chairs <[email protected]>; IETF MPLS List <[email protected]> Subject: [mpls] Intended Status of draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm-mpls Dear WG: Haoyu Song is the Shepherd for this document. During his review, he proposed changing the Intended Status of this work from Informational to Standards Track. Here is his justification: Here’s the reason to support the standard type: the document describes standard procedures and protocol extensions for using STAMP over SR-MPLS networks. It specifies control and data plane interactions, encapsulation methods, and interoperability mechanisms that require standardization to ensure consistent implementations across different vendor hardware. Protocol extensions designed for widespread implementation and interoperability belong on the standards track. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/EzMtFTSXO572dfHiiNi07hC9v0M/ Although he sent the message to the list, we haven't heard any other opinions (besides Rakesh's, as a co-author). We would like to hear opinions on Haoyu's proposed change. Please explain why you might be in favor of, or against, a change in the Status. We will take opinions until Oct/15, 2026. Thanks! Alvaro.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
