Hi all, I agree with the proposal to shift this document to standards track.
Best, Fabian On 10/2/26 08:40, Alvaro Retana wrote:
Dear WG:Haoyu Song is the Shepherd for this document. During his review, he proposed changing the Intended Status of this work from Informational to Standards Track. Here is his justification:Here’s the reason to support the standard type: the document describesstandard procedures and protocol extensions for using STAMP over SR-MPLS networks. It specifies control and data plane interactions, encapsulation methods, and interoperability mechanisms that require standardization to ensure consistent implementations across different vendor hardware. Protocolextensions designed for widespread implementation and interoperability belong on the standards track. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/EzMtFTSXO572dfHiiNi07hC9v0M/Although he sent the message to the list, we haven't heard any other opinions (besides Rakesh's, as a co-author).We would like to hear opinions on Haoyu's proposed change.Please explain why you might be in favor of, or against, a change in the Status.We will take opinions until Oct/15, 2026. Thanks! Alvaro.
-- Fabian Ihle Universität Tübingen Fachbereich Informatik Lehrstuhl Kommunikationsnetze Wilhelm-Schickard-Institut für Informatik Sand 13, 72076 Tübingen Raum: B303 Telefonnr.: +49 7071 29-70545 E-Mail:[email protected] Internet: uni-tuebingen.de
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
