Hi Alvaro / WG, As a contributor, I support advancing this draft to the Standards Track. Its focus on protocol extensions and interoperability, together with the use of IANA-assigned codepoints, makes the Standards Track an appropriate fit.
Brgds, Amit On Fri, Oct 2, 2026 at 2:40 AM Alvaro Retana <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Dear WG: Haoyu Song is the Shepherd for this document. During his review, he proposed changing the Intended Status of this work from Informational to Standards Track. Here is his justification: Here’s the reason to support the standard type: the document describes standard procedures and protocol extensions for using STAMP over SR-MPLS networks. It specifies control and data plane interactions, encapsulation methods, and interoperability mechanisms that require standardization to ensure consistent implementations across different vendor hardware. Protocol extensions designed for widespread implementation and interoperability belong on the standards track. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/EzMtFTSXO572dfHiiNi07hC9v0M/ Although he sent the message to the list, we haven't heard any other opinions (besides Rakesh's, as a co-author). We would like to hear opinions on Haoyu's proposed change. Please explain why you might be in favor of, or against, a change in the Status. We will take opinions until Oct/15, 2026. Thanks! Alvaro. _______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [EXTERNAL]
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
