if the BFP can act as the system check valve, why not use one of its
valves as the required system valve?
Roland
On Mar 28, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Ron Greenman wrote:
Charles,
Slippery slope. The only reason there is a valve on each side of the
BFP is to isolate it for testing. As such those valves are part of the
listing of the BFP and cannot be used in the configuration you
describe.
On 3/28/07, Haugen, Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just position it AFTER the tee split, correct? I can see that
working
as well.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
Shelton
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 1:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Riser Schematic vs.
InstallationPractices...(sorryifdoubledup...)
So, does anyone see why the gate valve on the downstream side of a
BFP
can't be used as the system isolation valve?
Eric Shelton
Hankins and Anderson, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
--
Ron Greenman
at home....
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
