Doesn't 8.15.1.1 (2002) address this?  And the reason for this
arrangement goes way back to if you need to service the check valve (in
this case BFP) you can still have the f.d. in service to both systems.
The control valve on the system side of the BFP would be the BFP
isolation valve.

Scott   

(763) 425-1001 Office 
(612) 759-5556 Cell 


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roland
Huggins
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 5:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Riser Schematic
vs.InstallationPractices...(sorryifdoubledup...)

if the BFP can act as the system check valve, why not use one of its  
valves as the required system valve?

Roland

On Mar 28, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Ron Greenman wrote:

> Charles,
>
> Slippery slope. The only reason there is a valve on each side of the
> BFP is to isolate it for testing. As such those valves are part of the
> listing of the BFP and cannot be used in the configuration you
> describe.
>
> On 3/28/07, Haugen, Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just position it AFTER the tee split, correct?  I can see that  
>> working
>> as well.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
>> Shelton
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 1:57 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Riser Schematic vs.
>> InstallationPractices...(sorryifdoubledup...)
>>
>> So, does anyone see why the gate valve on the downstream side of a  
>> BFP
>> can't be used as the system isolation valve?
>>
>> Eric Shelton
>> Hankins and Anderson, Inc.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>>
>> To Unsubscribe, send an email
>> to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>>
>> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum- 
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Ron Greenman
> at home....
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum- 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to