My one concern with the arrangement that would flow through a system is
that the test would occur while the building was occupied and if there
was a failure what the consequences could be.  Granted it wouldn't be
desirable for it to fail in a fire scenario either.  

Sorry but I just can't see any reason to put it at the end of some bulk
main instead of right at the pump.  

Craig L. Prahl, CET
Fire Protection Group
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.lg.com


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Kramer
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 3:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: pump test header location

In this scenario, yes.  I've never considered attaching the test header
to anyplace other than between the pump check and shutoff valve, but it
seems it may be common practice in some areas.  

My knee-jerk reaction to pressuring the ENTIRE fire protection system
when testing a fire pump is that's its unwise.  But what's the worst
that's going to happen?  The entire system will see pressures in the
ball park of
5 psi greater than the jockey pump pressure (but significantly higher
when water hammer or pressure waves are a factor) and weak pipe/fittings
may blow out (possibly causing extensive damage) and require
repair/replacement.  Seems to me it's wiser to find & fix weak parts of
the system during routine testing than it is to find them during a fire
emergency.

Having said that, I still prefer the test header be tied in between the
pump check & shutoff valve.  Makes for a tidy pump package and gives the
testing technician the option of pressuring the entire system or not.

Ed Kramer
Littleton, CO


>So you'd be flowing through the underground and whatever sprinkler 
>system piping just to test a pump?
>
>Craig L. Prahl, CET
>Fire Protection Group
>Mechanical Department
>CH2MHILL
>Lockwood Greene
>1500 International Drive
>PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491 Direct - 864.599.4102 Fax - 
>864.599.8439 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lg.com

>Ron,
>
>Lets say you got a pump that requires 8" discharge pipe, your sprinkler

>bulk main is 6", and you decide to connect the test header to the end 
>of the bulk main.  Have you had any problems getting the test header 
>calc to work? (never, rarely, sometimes, etc.)
>
>Ed Kramer
>Littleton, CO
>
>
>>It's more common to take the test header off the end of bulk main or 
>>combine it with the FDC line if the header is remote from the pump
>room.
>>
>>Ron Fletcher
>>Aero Automatic
>>Phoenix, AZ


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to