I would not fill the space with those of Cowboys fans, as this is an actual
vacuum. As we all know, if this space is placed under a vacuum, the flash
point is lowered dramatically, and can result in a much faster developing
fire.

Matt

Matthew J. Willis
Living Water Fire Protection, LLC.
1160 McKenzie Rd.
PO Box 877
Cantonment, FL. 32533
850-937-1850 Voice
850-937-1852 Facsimile
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

----- >-----Original Message-----
----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
----- >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
----- >Behalf Of Steve Leyton
----- >Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 10:23 AM
----- >To: [email protected]
----- >Subject: RE: NFPA 13, 2002 A.3.7.1 (4)
----- >
----- >You're right.   There's a huge stockpile of broken and 
----- >shattered dreams
----- >in Big D.
----- >
----- >Memo to the Munce:  I know, I know, stick to sprinklers. 
----- > But it's just so darned EXCITING.  We're pro sports 
----- >Siberia out here ...
----- >
----- >Steve Leyton
----- >Protection Design & Consulting
----- >
----- >
----- >-----Original Message-----
----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
----- >Behalf Of Bill Minkel
----- >Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 6:21 AM
----- >To: [email protected]
----- >Subject: RE: NFPA 13, 2002 A.3.7.1 (4)
----- >
----- > No, use instead the broken dreams of Cowboys fans.
----- >
----- >
----- >Bill Minkel, Designer
----- >Western States Fire Protection, Dallas
----- >NFPA Member #2578666
----- >
----- >-----Original Message-----
----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
----- >Behalf Of Steve Leyton
----- >Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 5:10 PM
----- >To: [email protected]
----- >Subject: RE: NFPA 13, 2002 A.3.7.1 (4)
----- >
----- >I already thought of that, but in the case I'm looking 
----- >at now there isn't any fire-proofing.  Maybe we could 
----- >fill the voids with the broken dreams of Patriot fans 
----- >everywhere ...
----- >
----- >Steve Leyton
----- >Protection Design & Consulting
----- >
----- >
----- >-----Original Message-----
----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
----- >Behalf Of Thom McMahon
----- >Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 2:20 PM
----- >To: [email protected]
----- >Subject: Re: NFPA 13, 2002 A.3.7.1 (4)
----- >
----- >We currently are doing a panel construction parking 
----- >structure under a mixed use building, and are relying on 
----- >the fire proofing to fill those voids.
----- >The spray on application generally does a pretty good job.
----- >
----- >Thom McMahon
----- >Firetech, Inc.
----- >2560 Copper Ridge Dr
----- >Steamboat Springs, CO 80488-2136
----- >Tel: 970-879-7952
----- >Fax: 970-879-7926
----- >----- Original Message -----
----- >From: "Roland Huggins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
----- >To: <[email protected]>
----- >Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 1:44 PM
----- >Subject: Re: NFPA 13, 2002 A.3.7.1 (4)
----- >
----- >
----- >> The question that prompted the change was zackery this 
----- >issue, ie the 
----- >> channels in the metal pan of a poured concrete floor 
----- >assembly.  Since
----- >the 
----- >> allowance to treat the panel pocket as obstructed 
----- >construction  and
----- >place 
----- >> the sprinklers further down from the ceiling is based 
----- >on  capturing
----- >heat, 
----- >> having all those open channels seemed counter- 
----- >productive. Thus the 
----- >> clarification with the wording "including the  
----- >interface at the roof".
----- >
----- >> Granted the "roof" is on the outside but  it's used 
----- >synonymously with 
----- >> ceiling as in 3.9.16 Roof Height.
----- >>
----- >> Roland
----- >>
----- >> On Jan 17, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Steve Leyton wrote:
----- >>
----- >>> Per the above section, the definition panel construction was
----- >modified to
----- >>> include the language, " ... There should be no 
----- >unfilled  penetrations
----- >in
----- >>> the cross sectional area of the  bounding structural members
----- >including
----- >>> the interface at the roof."
----- >>>
----- >>> Where structural steel decking is supported by steel beams and
----- >girders
----- >>> that otherwise meet the definition of panel 
----- >construction, was it the 
----- >>> committee's intent that the openings created by the 
----- >decking flutes
----- >must
----- >>> be filled above the top chord of said beams and 
----- >girders?  Or does
----- >naked
----- >>> steel decking still meet the intent of the definition 
----- >of panel 
----- >>> construction?
----- >>>
----- >>>
----- >>> Steve Leyton
----- >>> PROTECTION DESIGN & CONSULTING
----- >>> 8849-B Complex Drive
----- >>> San Diego, CA 92123
----- >>> -------------------------------------------------------------
----- >>> Ph:      858.751.2930 - Ext. 102
----- >>> Fax:    858.751.2933
----- >>> Cell:  619.972.5696
----- >>>
----- >>>
----- >>> _______________________________________________
----- >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
----- >>> [email protected]
----- >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
----- >>>
----- >>> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum- 
----- >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe 
----- >in the subject 
----- >>> field)
----- >>>
----- >>
----- >> _______________________________________________
----- >> Sprinklerforum mailing list
----- >> [email protected]
----- >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
----- >>
----- >> To Unsubscribe, send an email
----- >to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- >> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
----- >>
----- >> 
----- >
----- >_______________________________________________
----- >Sprinklerforum mailing list
----- >[email protected]
----- >http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
----- >
----- >To Unsubscribe, send an email
----- >to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- >(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) 
----- >_______________________________________________
----- >Sprinklerforum mailing list
----- >[email protected]
----- >http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
----- >
----- >To Unsubscribe, send an email
----- >to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- >(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
----- >
----- >_______________________________________________
----- >Sprinklerforum mailing list
----- >[email protected]
----- >http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
----- >
----- >To Unsubscribe, send an email
----- >to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- >(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) 
----- >_______________________________________________
----- >Sprinklerforum mailing list
----- >[email protected]
----- >http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
----- >
----- >To Unsubscribe, send an email 
----- >to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- >(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to