Can I throw my 2 cents out there?

7,300 square foot house. That's at least a $2,000,000 million dollar
property where I'm from. When do you say "hey, we need to protect the
property too!"

A BBQ left unattended on a back patio could (yes I said could) take the
whole house down even if it had a 13D system within.

We'll protect non-combustible restaurants with NFPA 13 systems when they are
6,000 sq ft with fire lanes and fire hydrants in the parking lots, but a
house framed with cardboards second cousin (the light weight engineered
floor joist) is protected with a system capable of flowing 60gpm tops.

I am aware of two instances where 13R system didn't protect a building from
a fire started under an outside eave. Luckily on both accounts the fire
departments had good access and no one was injured.

As I said my 2 pennys worth,

Randy Knutson
Shilo Automatic Sprinkler, Inc.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Cahill
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 4:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: 13 system in SFR

Normally you are right on George (I'll take a virtual beer for that virtual
plug)

....but this one is a little greyer.  The original post said "because of
it's remoteness from the street."  You get into IFC 503.1.1 and access
roads.  There is a little interpretation allowed in this section.  Sounds
like he's using his authority under exception #1 to increase the 150'
dimension for NFPA 13 but won't for 13R or 13D.  Now I don't personally
think he gets to choose from the list when the exception says 13, 13R OR
13D.  I believe the or is the designers choice.

Exception #2 could also be being used - "cannot" do the road, doesn't really
matter the reason.  With "cannot" AHJ is free to use and alternate, he says
cannot = 13.

Of course he's missing #3 which is the exception for one or two houses or U
occupancy.  Now if they have an out building and house they still have not
more than 2.  Perhaps there is 3 building then you are back to exception #1
and #2.  Again most important designer gets to choose which exception.

Don't overlook 503.1.2.  Mike could be from a snow belt and/or mountains and
the AHJ is saying two roads are needed for everything as a way to get more
sprinklers.  Great but 13 is a little much for a house strictly code wise
IMHO.  But the AHJ certainly could be saying 2 roads or 13 under his
authority in 503.1.2.  

All that works without any amendment. Don't get me wrong AHJ drive me nuts
as well.  

I won't be as detailed but IFC 508 has power for the AHJ similar to IFC
503.1.1.  

So there appears to be some basis for the 'cuz in this case.  We may not
like it but there is wiggle room here.  Details will shed some light. Mike
certainly needs to find out where the AHJ is coming from and he may be very
disappointed to have found a sharp AHJ that knows how to get his way legally
- vs. the nitwits (most lurker AHJ's excluded) who try to get their way by
being bullies.    

Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.
 
763-658-4483
763-658-4921 fax
 
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Mail: P.O. Box 69
        Waverly, MN 55390
 
Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
              Waverly, MN 55390
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Church
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 4:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: 13 system in SFR

Gentlemen:
Stop circling the wagons!
Go back to the original post.
" An AHJ wants a 13 system in a "
Most AHJs would want a #13 system in every building.
And if they have a properly adopted local amendment, they can require this.
If they don't, then you look at the adopted building code the AHJ is
empowered to enforce, and if it doe not require #13 for SFD's, then he can
want Ed McMahon to show up on his doorstep with a check for a million
dollars, but Ed doesn't have to divert his checks from keeping his 100,000
SF house if he doesn't want to because "wants" isn't the same thing as
"legally required".

With all the debate about PE ineptness on this Forum (choir members in
attendance excepted, of course), why would we accept the AHJ's proclamations
as if they contain more substance just because he's an AHJ?

"JUST SAY NO!" when they try to enforce their beliefs instead of the ADOPTED
CODE.

We had a pump test interrupted couple weeks ago when the AHJ asked us to use
a calibrated gauge. There was NO BASIS IN CODE for this request. Our pump
dude had a calibrated gauge with a date noted on it, so we didn't use the
new ones out of the box we brought along. 30 emails between Ken H and the
AHJ later, we came to an understanding of each other's positions. Maybe
they'll adopt it. But unless you want to do bucket tests in ESFR warehouses,
there is no reason for you to jump thru hoops that -when carefully examined-
don't exist.

glc


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cliff
Whitfield
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 4:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: 13 system in SFR

Mike,

If you have to do a 13 system, you can use the "dwelling unit" design.  That
may help some.  What about the attic?  Do you have to sprinkler it?

Cliff Whitfield, SET
Fire Design, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 3:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: 13 system in SFR

An AHJ wants a 13 system in a 7,300 sqft house because of it's remoteness
from the street. Is the best I can do is calculate 900 sqft because of it
being light hazard with ceilings less that 12' high? Or can I reduce the
area more some how? Please help.
Mike
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to