Many thanks, gentlemen - an inexhaustible resource of information and knowledge - as usual !

Stewart
On 20 Jan 2009, at 21:22, Chris Cahill wrote:

Except supposedly the fabrication process locally destroys the coatings. And the other components like weld-o-lets, heads, valves and mech- tees are
not coated.

Plastic/steel what another future headache.

Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.

763-658-4483
763-658-4921 fax

Email: [email protected]

Mail: P.O. Box 69
       Waverly, MN 55390

Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
             Waverly, MN 55390

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of George Church
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 3:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: MIC

Allied and most other steel pipe mfrs here in the US are coating their pipe
with an anti-MIC coating.
I'm sure details are available at their website, I think Allied was first.

Subsequently, Blazemaster and others became aware that this anti-MIC coating is detrimental to CPVC. I understand the good news is you won't have MIC in the steel and IF it reacts, it does so early in the game so you can replace the CPVC before your next financials are done, so you can match expenses
with no revenue accurately.

Seriously, I understand there IS a reaction.

We'll need to know what is the priority of the problems-
If 30% of steel pipe got MIC and only .00001 % of CPVC had allergies from
the coating, you'd use the coating.
If the numbers are reversed, you'd buy uncoated pipe and use it.

We're having to consider keeping uncoated pipe for use on systems with CPVC
(sigh)
Another set of items to maintain and track.

I doubt there is a lot of empirical data yet, and this news is all pretty recent. So until there is more data, those that would study it can't draw
much in the way of conclusions worth much.

So now its just another item to aid insomnia.....

Cheers!
glc

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stewart Kidd
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: MIC



Colleagues

I have received an enquiry from a UK company as follows:

" Has anyone heard of "anti MIC chemical coatings" for metal sprinkler
systems?"

Can anyone help ?

Thanks

Stewart_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to