David,
I believe it is wrong to speak in derogatory terms about people or groups, but 
I believe it is equally wrong not to criticise or condemn the guilty.  I also 
believe we should not refer to our public servants as political leaders. 
Leaders they are not, servants they are supposed to be. Respect they must earn, 
and they could certainly earn one persons respect and not anothers. If they 
were truely leaders, it would be easier to respect them, even if one doesn't 
agree. But for the most part, imho, far too many of our elected public 
servants, and this one in particula, act as if they are somehow in charge of 
everything, rather than being responsible to the Citizens of our great Country 
for the powers we entrust to them. I believe that not only Nancy Pelosi but the 
good citizens of California that voted for her or did not vote owe the people 
of this country an appology for sending this embarrassing example a public 
servant to Washington D C. 
Mark at Aero
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]on Behalf Of David de
Vries
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 12:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: system review, now "Pelosi"


That this forum has such outstanding participation and participants speaks to 
the fact that, like the children of a small MN town, we are all above average.
 
One thing we seem to share is a desire to see good quality fire protection in 
our communities and in the work that we all do.  This is the strength of the 
Forum.  What we do not share, necessarily, is agreement on matters political 
(and perhaps religious, but I have not scene the words "Pope" or "Buddha" used 
in vain).
 
As a courtesy to others, I would suggest that all Forum participants refrain 
from using the names of political leaders, particularly in a derogatory 
context, unless commenting on their positions on fire protection.

Dave 

David A. de Vries, P.E., CSP 
Firetech Engineering Incorporated 


--- On Fri, 2/27/09, George Church <[email protected]> wrote:

From: George Church <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: system review
To: [email protected]
Date: Friday, February 27, 2009, 12:23 PM

Hmm.
If you're objecting to the use of Pelosi as bs, I apologize but feel her
actions and very public stature almost beg for it, and I'll likely
continue.
Sorry if it bothers you. I apologize if anyone was offended by Pelosi, but
she offends me often.

As for Leyton and McMahon, we often debate and disagree but remain friends-
in Leyton's case, by avoiding political discussion, in Thom's, cooking.
But
hopefully Forumites know we're friends and much of this is planned
backhanded compliments. If I really wanted to upset one of them, I'd post
pics of the go kart racing- another reason to go to AFSA's national
convention.

I don't think there's much in the way of personal attacks on the forum,
and
as Ron recently exemplified, an apology is all that's needed to reverse
what
seemed like a good (or tolerable) idea at the time, but wasn't. He's
certainly contributed enough good stuff to forgive him, and I know he has a
ton of pressure on him with the volume slamming thru Aero (or at least DID).
He's a good guy, have met him at Convention:)

And ALL of us here are more equal than others who aren't.

glc

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of å... ....
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 12:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: system review

I think it is Leyton-degrading to use someone's name in vain.although i am
as guilty as the next.
I know what it feels like to be cast as a jack-ass.
Conform to the norm, or they assume you can't perform.

If we got a God-Deal problem with something, then McMahon-almighty
  call out the problem, because the person is not the problem.
  and you probably are just creating another bigger problem in name blaming.

  The problem is: not-focussing-on-the-problem, and substituting
  a scapegoat for the situation.  Focus on the issues, not the
  person.  That way the
  chicken-Brumblebee readers  will have to
  evaluate the article based on what actually is presented,
  rather than evaluating the article based on whose name
  gave the swag its game.

It is low-brow, bad quality work, to call someone a Leyton-jerk.

Separate the job from the person, and for certain it makes workin a lot
easier.
Will this happen in my lifetime?  It hasn't since recorded history.
Then why change?  Because it is a better way, and you better
assure that person the chance that person will be there and
join  forces with you in a future instance.
This isn't group-hug... this is just good business duh.

We all don't have to be sleep-over partners or hangover brothers
to trust one another, if we argue over the most logical, and
hopefully the most reasonable answers.  Win some problems,
lose others, but if we keep the personal MORE distant, then we
all can go back at it, together, later, in a more objective and a less
ego-bruised way.

yes, I am God-Deal Leyton-ing Brumblebee-dick, but i refuse
to let that label stick.  evaluate the situation,
not the author, company or authentication.  It will
help quell the herd mentality and propensity toward
Animal Farm senility.


scot deal
excelsior fire engineering
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to