There are those mission-critical folks, and those risk-averters, that SHOULD
spend more than minimum consensus standards required.
I'm sure there are a lot of folks that are glad the Pentagon may have had a
heavier-than-usual spec.
And an airport needs to realize- as do many other "targets"
That multiple fires are more likely than before terrorist threats became a
reality.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 12:38 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Fire water mains for multiple building areas

I agree with Chris that this is the big issue. One of the a priori s of the
standards is the single fire concept. Once you shift away from that all bets
are off relative to the NFPA standards you've listed.
You are now dealing with a municipal water system in theory and given the
size, threat, etc. of your "city" you need a water supply that is
commensurate with that concept. OI don't know of any particular
documentation you could search but I wouldn't be surprised if there weren't
guidelines that insurance raters use to rate municipalities that would apply
or at least provide a starting point.

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Chris Cahill <[email protected]>
wrote:
> "stakeholder demand to cope with two simultaneous fires."  That is the 
> critical phrase as I see it.  If the stakeholder wants this and thus 
> is willing to pay for it what does it matter?  Big pump(s), big 
> tanks(s).  Just be careful on the big tanks.  Sounds like this system 
> could also serve domestic uses much like a municipal system and if you 
> don't get the turnover in the tanks that water gets "stale".
>
> Chris Cahill
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Geir 
> Jensen
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 5:47 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Fire water mains for multiple building areas
>
> Fire water mains of a propritary large development shall serve 
> multiple sprinklered buildings spaced well apart. Envision an 
> industrial plant, an airport or a university campus including 
> laboratories. The fire water mains shall also serve fire brigade hydrants.
>
> In such cases we comply with a number of standards within NFPA (such 
> as 1, 13, 24, 14, 101 and the occupancy specific standards) or 
> similar. Add to this national regulations. Add to this hose allowance. 
> Even add to this stakeholder demand to cope with two simultaneous fires.
>
> In complying to all requirements, water demand tends to increase by 
> method of addition to seemingly unrealistic proportion. Each standard 
> incorporate a kind of safety factor, so in lack of a systematic 
> approach (like probability risk analysis) water demand is unduly
increased.
>
> Any suggestion to a guide or a standard that addresses this?
> Any experience on determining the demand at such large proprietary 
> fire water mains?
>
> I am not asking about the water mains design. My concern is assessment 
> of water demand only.
>
>
> Geir Jensen
> COWI Fire
> Technical Director
> [email protected]<mailto:%[email protected]>
> www.cowi.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email 
> to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email 
> to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>



--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima Ave.
Tacoma, WA 98405

[email protected]

http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/

253.680.7346
253.576.9700 (cell)

Member:
AFSA, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, NFSA, AFAA, ASEE, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC

They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis Bacon,
essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to