I read adjacent to mean the overhead system over (adjacent to) the racks in question (might be one, might be 40K sqft), not necessarily the one to either side. language is so slippery. Vince, what did you mean by adjacent?
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Bobby Gillett < [email protected]> wrote: > I agree with Ken, when we do in racks systems they have a separate control > valve at the riser - best practice. However I believe he is asking the > following (this is an example): If you have two overhead systems 40,000ft > ۛ² each and you have two 40,000ft ۛ² in rack systems, one under each > overhead system, can you feed rack system number one from the main from > overhead system number two and vice versa? I believe you could do this > since you wouldn't be cutting off the in racks and overhead system in the > same area. If you cut off overhead system number one you would be cutting > off the inracks under number two at the same time. > > Is this practical or best way to do this, I say not but acceptable - I > feel it would be. Someone may want a control valve and drain valve to the > rack system after the split so if you needed to work on the rack system > alone you could. > > Bobby Gillett > Sr. Project Manager > Key Fire Protection, Inc. > (731) 424-0130 office (731) 424-9285 fax > (731) 267-4853 cell > www.keyfireprotection.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Huggins > Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 12:22 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: What's wrong with this? > > I've always been of the opinion that the standard is written around > addressing a single system (except where explicitly allowed). As > such, I would say he could not use the adjacent system. Ken Wagoner > already pointed out the reason for the separate control valves > (limiting the area out of service while servicing or replacing in-rack > sprinklers). > > Roland > > On Feb 1, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Bobby Gillett wrote: > > > Yes, after rereading the question, the answers did get away a bit. I > > believe > > his suggestion would be acceptable as long as it was balanced at the > > point > > of connection. > > > > Bobby Gillett > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2109/4779 - Release Date: 02/01/12 > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > -- Ron Greenman Instructor Fire Protection Engineering Technology Bates Technical College 1101 So. Yakima Ave. Tacoma, WA 98405 [email protected] http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/ 253.680.7346 253.576.9700 (cell) Member: ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis Bacon, essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20120201/db3e1615/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
