One more comment: You still need the flowing pressure OR a pitot psi or at
least a residual psi at the test header. If the BFP is becomes restricted
the pressures are necessary to determine the next step. Without psi and flow
the K has no meaning except to have a basis for the device when in new
working condition.

Arthur Tiroly
ATCO Fire Protection Design
Tiroly and Associates
24400 Highland Rd rm 25, CLE 44143
216-621-8899
216-570-7030 Cell
WWW.ATCOfirepro.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of George Church
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 1:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: k -- WHAT?

Wasn't it a hose valve for forward flushing of the BFP that was the original
question?

And don't K factors have to be empirically derived? I once tried to
determine the logo sprinkler atop a building wherein I worked in 1988, and
was told without drilling a hole where the orifice was and pumping a LOT of
water thru it, we couldn't determine it via formula. I was talking to folks
in Lansdale that I think know a lot about large K factors, even back in the
80's.

If I were to try to determine how many 2.5" FHV I needed to flow a certain
value, I'd simulate it with a test header. Can't think its much different
than the # of FHVs needed per #20, and we've been doing that far longer than
we've been using even hand calcs. 

KISB. Keep It Simple, Brad. This is an imprecise business, deal with it.


George L.  Church, Jr., CET
Rowe Sprinkler Systems, Inc.
PO Box 407, Middleburg, PA 17842
877-324-ROWE       570-837-6335 fax
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brad
Casterline
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 11:37 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: k -- WHAT?

But since friction head with turbulent (sprinkler) flow is proportional to
the velocity squared, and the data from Ron Greenman's link says 'K Value
for use in the formula hf=k(v^2/2g)', and the velocity varies as the flow,
wouldn't the K Value give us the friction loss 'curve' we are looking for,
as opposed to an average over a range?

-----Original Message-----
From: Roland Huggins [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: k -- WHAT?

I started to say before getting overly precise (but that horse has left the
barn), it might be helpful to keep in mind that the K valve on a sprinkler
is NOT a constant at different flows.  It is an AVERAGED result for flows
from 7 psi to 100 psi.

Roland

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to