Yes, I was thinking about using the room design method. In this instance, there 
would be not reasonable was to remove the sheet rock in example #1, and pretty 
tough to do anything in example #2.
 
Is there any reason not to use the room design method here?

Greg Lindholm
 

> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Attic Remote Area
> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:26:16 -0700
> 
> concur, we ignore even rated walls unless using room design method.
> 
> There is new guidance on how to address small subsystems (such as dry- 
> pipe on loading docks or preaction in computer room) in the 2013 
> edition of NFPA 13. This use to be a particularly tricky issue when 
> applying logic for an answer when the sub-system like a loading dock 
> uses spray sprinklers and the adjacent warehouse system uses ESFR. 
> See the June issue of Sprinkler Age for more information.
> 
> Roland
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 31, 2012, at 10:57 AM, Cahill, Christopher wrote:
> 
> > 1. Assuming they are the same system. Yes, where does it say you 
> > can reduce the area below 2,535? Getting the total area is almost a 
> > Cardinal rule. Only way out is room design method if it applies. 
> > But that entails being reasonably sure the required walls will 
> > remain after the legendary cable guy comes through. One reason the 
> > room design method is flawed, owners can take down walls without 
> > even thinking sprinklers (as long as they are 6' apart). I 
> > guarantee during inspection no one knows if it room design or not. 
> > I know we can't plan for the future.
> > 2. Same answer.
> >
> > Chris Cahill, PE*
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20120831/1ff2322f/attachment.html>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
                                          
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20120831/aaf31bdb/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to