We just protected an OH2 store with a #22 tank and a pair of single phase #20 
pumps when 3 phase wasn't available. 
Cheaper than a pressure tank(s). 
Glc

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 31, 2012, at 3:43 PM, "Cahill, Christopher" <ccah...@burnsmcd.com> wrote:

> Well I don't know how you get 30 minutes if only rocked on one side per:
> 11.2.3.3.3 To utilize the room design method, all rooms shall be enclosed 
> with walls having a fire-resistance rating equal to the water supply duration 
> indicated in Table 11.2.3.1.2.
> 
> And in #2 - 2,260 still isn't enough unless you meet the same rating issue 
> wherever an additional 275 sq.ft. might be. 
> 
> I have used room design in these cases a couple times particularly where the 
> water supply was an issue.  Imagine no three phase power and no water.  
> Cutting a small attic in half saves the day with a single phase pump and 
> small tank. 
> 
> Chris Cahill, PE*
> Senior Fire Protection Engineer, Aviation & Facilities Group
> Burns & McDonnell
> 8201 Norman Center Drive
> Bloomington, MN 55437
> Phone:  952.656.3652
> Fax:  952.229.2923
> ccah...@burnsmcd.com
> www.burnsmcd.com
> 
> Proud to be one of FORTUNE's 100 Best Companies to Work For
> *Registered in: MN
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
> [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Gregory 
> Lindholm
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 1:41 PM
> To: SprinklerFORUM
> Subject: RE: Attic Remote Area
> 
> 
> Yes, I was thinking about using the room design method. In this instance, 
> there would be not reasonable was to remove the sheet rock in example #1, and 
> pretty tough to do anything in example #2.
> 
> Is there any reason not to use the room design method here?
> 
> Greg Lindholm
> 
> 
>> From: rhugg...@firesprinkler.org
>> To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
>> Subject: Re: Attic Remote Area
>> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:26:16 -0700
>> 
>> concur, we ignore even rated walls unless using room design method.
>> 
>> There is new guidance on how to address small subsystems (such as dry- 
>> pipe on loading docks or preaction in computer room) in the 2013 
>> edition of NFPA 13. This use to be a particularly tricky issue when 
>> applying logic for an answer when the sub-system like a loading dock 
>> uses spray sprinklers and the adjacent warehouse system uses ESFR.
>> See the June issue of Sprinkler Age for more information.
>> 
>> Roland
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 31, 2012, at 10:57 AM, Cahill, Christopher wrote:
>> 
>>> 1. Assuming they are the same system. Yes, where does it say you can 
>>> reduce the area below 2,535? Getting the total area is almost a 
>>> Cardinal rule. Only way out is room design method if it applies.
>>> But that entails being reasonably sure the required walls will 
>>> remain after the legendary cable guy comes through. One reason the 
>>> room design method is flawed, owners can take down walls without 
>>> even thinking sprinklers (as long as they are 6' apart). I guarantee 
>>> during inspection no one knows if it room design or not.
>>> I know we can't plan for the future.
>>> 2. Same answer.
>>> 
>>> Chris Cahill, PE*
>> 
>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was 
>> scrubbed...
>> URL: 
>> <http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/atta
>> chments/20120831/1ff2322f/attachment.html>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>                         
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20120831/aaf31bdb/attachment.html>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to