A couple of years back we had a company come in and do their dog and pony show 
regarding seismic bracing for mechanical systems.  They specialize in the 
hardware but also will do the engineering and provide a complete package to the 
contractor for installation.

SDC A & B as has been stated in this discussion, do not require bracing on 
sprinkler systems.  SDC C is when it begins and those requirements can be met 
by applying the prescribed methods within NFPA 13.  When you get to SDC D then 
special engineering and special inspections come into play.

Please don't talk about Seismic Zones as they were once shown in NFPA 13, those 
zones are not relevant anymore and are not used to determine the need for 
seismic bracing.

Lastly, the info regarding the need for EQ bracing should be on the fire 
protection engineered drawings.  This should not be left up to the sprinkler 
contractor to determine.

Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection 
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SCĀ  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension  74102
[email protected]



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Born
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Seismic and ASCE 7

That is a consideration, but that is one of the factors that is evaluated to 
determine the seismic design category.  This is not an area that the average 
sprinkler contractor or designer should generally have to deal with or 
determine.

As long as someone has determined the seismic design category, preferably a 
licensed structural engineer, the sprinkler contractor/designer should be clear 
of any determination as to whether seismic protection is required.  If its 
seismic design category A or B, no seismic protection. Is required,  C and 
above, seismic protection is required.  If C, ASCE 7 acknowledges that 
compliance with NFPA 13 is adequate,  D or above, I believe determination of 
loads, etc., gets more involved,

Christopher Born, P.E.
Clark Nexsen
Norfolk, VA

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 14, 2013, at 11:38 PM, [email protected] wrote:

> I think the most important factor is "Is it an essential facility", like 
> hospital, fire station, police station, after an event. a warehouse would not 
> be.
> 
> Quoting Ron Greenman <[email protected]>:
> 
>> Hmmm, maybe just my West Coast interpretation. I've never done 
>> anything without bracing. Bracing has always been and just got nuts 
>> when ASCE 7 based calcs got into the code. I just thought that was 
>> special West Coast stuff applied to the generic stuff. Parochial thinking on 
>> my part.
>> 
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Cahill, Christopher
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>> 
>>> Well ...
>>> 9.3 Protection of Piping Against Damage Where Subject to Earthquakes.
>>> 9.3.1* General.
>>> 9.3.1.1 Where water-based fire protection systems are required to be 
>>> protected against damage from earthquakes, the requirements of 
>>> Section 9.3 shall apply, unless the requirements of 9.3.1.2 are met.
>>> 
>>> 9.3.5 has the 40/80 stuff and BL's are covered in 9.3.6.
>>> 
>>> Only place I know of and you can't get to .5 and .6 until you get 
>>> past 9.3.1.1.  And you can only get there from IBC/ASCE 7 SDC C or higher.
>>> 
>>> I'm all ears (well technically eyes in this forum) if you have some 
>>> other sections I'm missing.  Vast majority of US doesn't do any 
>>> bracing.  Working in MN I never saw one in 16 years until I started 
>>> this job and work everywhere except MN.  We just did a job in Boise 
>>> and none required (which surprised me as I figured it was close enough to 
>>> Yellowstone).
>>> 
>>> Chris Cahill, PE*
>>> Senior Fire Protection Engineer, Aviation & Facilities Group Burns & 
>>> McDonnell
>>> 8201 Norman Center Drive
>>> Bloomington, MN 55437
>>> Phone:  952.656.3652
>>> Fax:  952.229.2923
>>> [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to