I've shared this before I think, but it seems apt again:

I once pursued an A/E project where I felt the owner was seeking actual 
engineering from the engineer of record for the fire sprinkler system. I 
suggested to our team that we propose doing just that and sell ourselves as 
providing a complete design for the sprinkler contractors to bid 
apples-to-apples.  The mechanical engineer on the team (from a different 
company) suggested that taking on the design of the sprinkler system might be 
taking on too much risk/liability (after all, MEs are used to performance specs 
- usually without the performance part - my words not his).

That solidified my understanding of the MEs' approach to fire sprinkler 
systems. Not sure how they justify receiving payment for what they provide 
(unless it's a really small sum).

Mark A. Sornsin, P.E. | Karges-Faulconbridge, Inc. | Fire Protection Engineer | 
Fargo, ND | direct: 701.552.9905 | mobile: 701.371.5759 | 
http://www.kfiengineers.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Craig 
Leadbetter
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 5:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Hazard classification

Dwight,

I love the optimism that there is actually a spec to look at that says more 
than provide a system per code. No mention of commodities types on the plans 
and if I asked I have sure I would get the deer in the head lights look.

This has been great discussion on this topic, it confirms that my area of the 
country is not the only one that provides more questions than answers. I 
believe that most systems we see are under analyzed from a fire suppression 
stand point. Most engineers appear to be so afraid to put anything in writing 
when it comes to fire protection that we generally get an "X"
through the drawings with a note to provide per all codes and insurance
requirements, and add any additional heads at no cost to the owner.

Craig Leadbetter

_____________________
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to