I was thinking that the issues for protecting floor openings for conveyors 
would have at least some application to carousels

Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
www.fpdc.com

On Sep 4, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Greg McGahan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Since carousels are not addressed in 13 it is more interesting and 
> challenging. 
> 
> Greg
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Sep 4, 2013, at 8:12 AM, Todd - Work <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Greg,
>> 
>> I haven't run into this situation before, but I've done a few tire stores. A 
>> possibility would be to design the sprinklers for the tire storage on each 
>> level and put a water curtain around the opening. Also an interlock to shut 
>> down the carousel. You might have to increase the density over the opening 
>> as well as you noted. Challenging situation. Look at requirements for 
>> protecting conveyors to see if that gives you insight. 
>> 
>> Disclaimer: This is a guess based on limited knowledge. Take it as such.
>> 
>> Todd G Williams, PE
>> Fire Protection Design/Consulting
>> Stonington, CT
>> www.fpdc.com
>> 
>> On Sep 4, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Greg McGahan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> No takers? Anybody home?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Greg McGahan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Scenario - a 2 story building
>>>> 
>>>> There is a vertical tire carousel that goes through a mezzanine – hole
>>>> sized at 6’-4 x approx. 17’ which sits in the corner of the storage area
>>>> (general car parts) – to the 2nd floor. – The entire height of the
>>>> carousel is 18-7” from the ground level.
>>>> 
>>>> If we were to place a row of sprinklers along the wall (nothing above
>>>> them  all the way to the 2nd floor ceiling) and then on the opposite side
>>>> under the mezzanine, could we in effect comply with NFPA #13 2007 ed -
>>>> Table 18.4(a) (6) - for one row of in rack sprinklers so we could calculate
>>>> the system on the 2nd floor at .40 gpm?
>>>> 
>>>> This is a strange deal to me because it would seem like overkill to have a
>>>> .90 density to protect such a small area and then increase it by 15’-0 on
>>>> the 2 sides as required.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for your help
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Greg McGahan
>>>> Living Water Fire Protection, LLC <http://www.livingwaterfp.com>
>>>> 1160 McKenzie Road
>>>> Cantonment, FL 32533
>>>> 850-937-1850
>>>> fax 850-937-1852
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Greg McGahan
>>> Living Water Fire Protection, LLC <http://www.livingwaterfp.com>
>>> 1160 McKenzie Road
>>> Cantonment, FL 32533
>>> 850-937-1850
>>> fax 850-937-1852
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to