QR Reduction?
> On Aug 20, 2014, at 1:37 AM, Aaron Peck <[email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe because there's existing sprinklers that stay and are quick response? > Only reason I can think of. > > Aaron M. Peck SET > +1 (202) 407-9079 Skype > +855 (78) 700-407 > Sent from my iPad > >> On Aug 20, 2014, at 3:44 AM, John O'Connor <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Tyco makes the SW-20 and SW-24 for OH. It's Extended coverage, K=11.2 in >> Standard Response. You can use S/R in Ord Hazard. Why the need for QR in >> an OH occupancy? >> John O'Connor >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of J.P. Merlino/Ing. L.Lagomarsino & Asoc. >> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 2:48 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Sidewall sprinkler EC QR listed for ordinary hazard II >> >> Dear sirs: >> >> Is there any sidewall sprinkler with extended coverage, listed for ordinary >> hazard II and quick response? >> >> We need to protect an existing mercantile occupancy with a low height pocket >> ceiling. >> >> regards >> >> J.P. Merlino >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
