This is an NFPA standards-driven list serve and you're asking a legal
question that's really more in line with what code is adopted, how it's
adopted and what laws in your city/county/state may either empower or
prohibit so called "rump rules".    In some states a local AHJ is
supposed to submit a white paper to either their SFM or Building
Standards Commission, in other states it may be handled differently.  In
a many more states than most of us realize, they don't have an adopted
Fire Code, so the Chief gets to be Yosemite Sam.   And that's not
necessarily a bad thing if your state legislature is so backward that
they think it's okay not to have a Fire Code.   

You're fishing for someone to tell you that you don't have to put the
sprinklers in and the most prudent among us won't do that.   Ask me a
more subjective question:  Do I think there's value in putting
sprinklers under a cantilevered overhang over a driveway in a SFD
sprinkler system?   Do I think that's consistent with the intent of 13D
or Section P2904 of the IRC?   No and no.   But I'm not going to tell
you whether or not your local AHJ is empowered to do that or how do deal
with them other than to appeal to whoever's next up the ladder.   

As Ken said, even though we might organically and strenuously disagree
with a ruling like this, most often it's easier to conform and move on.

SL





-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 4:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 13D exterior overhangs.

So the AHJ can simply write a policy and "BAM" it's legal to be more
restrictive and costly? I always thought they had to submit to the
building standards commission, no?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 29, 2015, at 3:42 PM, Parsley Consulting
<[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Adding to what Steve mentioned, it's also worth being very careful on
which
> issues you care to fight over.   We've both run across AHJ's who
didn't "follow
> the rules" on mandating local requirements, and the fight was more 
> demanding than simply doing what was asked.
> 
> I emphasize that for me - not any reference to Steve - it cost me a 
> client, and any chance of ever getting a submittal through that AHJ in

> the future.  People are human.
> 
> *Ken Wagoner, SET
> *Parsley Consulting***
> *350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206
> *Escondido, California 92025
> *****Phone 760-745-6181*
> Visit our website <http://www.parsleyconsulting.com/>
> 
> 
> ***
>> On 1/29/2015 3:37 PM, Steve Leyton wrote:
>> Depends on whether it's ordained, or a local code amendment or policy
>> bulletin or just an off-handed comment.   Local fire and building
>> officials have several different statutory methods that they can use 
>> to make requirements that are more restrictive (or less) or beyond 
>> the minimum prescriptives of a code or standard.  But in theory, it's

>> supposed to be substantiated, documented and published in the public
>> domain.   So as far as whether the AHJ you're referring to can make
such
>> a requirement "...without an amendment ..." as you say, all depends 
>> on what the local municipal code and/or city manager and/or city 
>> attorney would say if you threw off the gloves.
>> 
>> My opinion only,
>> Steve Leyton
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sprinklerforum
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>> [email protected]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 3:29 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: 13D exterior overhangs.
>> 
>> 13D does not require heads in exterior over-hangs, such as a second 
>> story over-hanging a driveway. Can an AHJ apply 13 rules to 13D 
>> systems without an amendment and require heads in over-hangs 4' &
greater?
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprink
>> ler
>> .org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprink
>> ler.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler
.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to