Larry,

Thanks, I found it in the 2013 ROC, comment 13-143.  Its a shame, because
it sounds like they agreed but didn't like the backwall part for some other
reason.  McPhee's commentary in 13-135 would have made the appendix
language include areas behind sidewalls, but without something like that, I
have an AHJ basically telling me that this scenario is only allowed in a
13R installation.  My indentations aren't even as severe as those shown,
they're only 12" deep by 5 feet wide!  Oh well, I guess have something to
submit next cycle now.


Benjamin Young

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Larry Keeping <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The illustration that was first submitted for their consideration, was
> adjusted by the Technical Committee before it was accepted for addition
> into NFPA 13. The original submission showed a 9 ft wide by 2 ft deep entry
> vestibule on both sides of the corridor. I believe that when the figure was
> revised the "2 ft 0 in. max." should have been edited out.
>
> Larry Keeping
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Ben Young
> Sent: April-23-15 12:01 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Corridor shadow areas
>
> Does anyone know if there's an error with figure A.8.1.1(3)(a) in the 2013
> edition of NFPA 13?
> There appears to be an extraneous bit at the bottom that says '2 ft 0in.
> max'
>
> It looks like this is a holdover from a modification made to figure
> 6.4.6.3.3.2 in the 2013 edition of NFPA 13R.
>
> I'm wondering if the bottom of the figure accidentally got chopped off in
> the 13 version of the figure, and that the shadow areas behind the
> sidewalls in a hallway are allowed in a 13 system as well as a 13R system.
>
> I checked the 2016 first and second draft reports but didn't see any
> comments or proposals regarding this, though.
>
> Is this just wishful thinking on my part, or did someone goof up when they
> put the figure in?
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Benjamin Young
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to