I'll agree with you on that, but who will answer my first question? Any bold 
takers? 

Mark at Aero
602 820-7894

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 6, 2015, at 5:14 PM, "Steve Leyton" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I'm very forward thinking ...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 5:06 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Light & OH1 Hazard From Same Riser
> 
> This response,(not yours Steve) requires me to ask another question,
> which likely should be on a separate thread, but here goes. Is it the
> charter of the NFPA 13 committee to write or amend the language of the
> standard for what the AHJ will approve? Or rather is it the
> responsibility of the NFPA 13 committee to write or amend the language
> of the standard for the AHJ to ENFORCE. I think I may be really
> confused!
> 
> But for your response Steve, I'm not sure what you mean by "I told you
> so", because what you told me was " but I'm pretty sure that utility
> and/or mechanical rooms, service areas, etc. are classified in Chap 5
> (annex) as OH1.", which is not true, at least until next year.  :-)
> 
> Mark at Aero
> 602 820-7894
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Steve Leyton
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 2:15 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Light & OH1 Hazard From Same Riser
> 
> Good info Tom - thanks.
> 
> Mark Phelps - I TOLD YOU SO.
> 
> (winkie face)
> 
> SML
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom
> Wellen
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 11:25 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Light & OH1 Hazard From Same Riser
> 
> The next edition, 2016 will address mechanical rooms in the annex.  
> 
> I submitted PI No. 514 to address mechanical rooms:
> 
> Public Input No. 514-NFPA 13-2013 [ Section No. A.5.3.1 ]
> A.5.3.1
> Ordinary hazard (Group 1) occupancies include occupancies having uses
> and conditions similar to the following:
> (1) Automobile parking and showrooms
> (2) Bakeries
> (3) Beverage manufacturing
> (4) Canneries
> (5) Dairy products manufacturing and processing
> (6) Electronic plants
> (7) Glass and glass products manufacturing
> (8) Laundries
> (9) Restaurant service areas
> (10) Mechanical rooms with stockpiles up to 8 ft
> 
> Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input A new
> mechanical room by definition is a light hazard occupancy. The room is
> empty and the equipment is generally noncombustible. The AHJ likely will
> not buy off that the room will not be used for storage.
> 
> I also submitted Public Input No. 515-NFPA 13-2013 [ Section No. A.5.3.2
> ] that was rejected:
> A.5.3.2
> Ordinary hazard (Group 2) occupancies include occupancies having uses
> and conditions similar to the following:
> ......
> (31) Mechanical rooms with stockpiles up to 12 ft
> 
> Committee Statement
> Resolution: The definition of OH2 will drive the user to this occupancy
> hazard classification. This language is superfluous.
> 
> 
> Tom Wellen
> 
> 
>> On May 6, 2015, at 12:39 PM, Tim Stone <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> John,
>> Answers to 
>> #1   YES.
>> #2 NFPA 13 Chapter 5, current edition.
>> #3 Of course you can, there is no restriction.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> G. Tim Stone
>> 
>> G. Tim Stone Consulting, LLC
>> NICET Level III Engineering Technician Fire Protection Sprinkler 
>> Design and Consulting Services
>> 
>>                117 Old Stage Rd. - Essex Jct., VT. 05452
>> CELL: (802) 373-0638   TEL: (802) 434-2968   Fax: (802) 434-4343
>>                           [email protected]
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sprinklerforum
>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>> On Behalf Of John Allen, CET, CFPS
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 1:27 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Light & OH1 Hazard From Same Riser
>> 
>> Okay, I'm really confused.  In NFPA 13HB - 2013, I found the
> following:
>> 
>> FAQ: Can nonmetallic pipe be used in an ordinary hazard occupancy?
>> Nonmetallic pipe is not permitted in ordinary hazard occupancies and 
>> is only permitted in specific small ordinary hazard rooms within light
> 
>> hazard occupancies. The limitation to rooms that do not exceed 400 ft2
> 
>> (37 m2) recognizes that almost all buildings have typically small 
>> storage rooms or mechanical rooms that would be categorized as 
>> ordinary hazard. Requiring a change in pipe type for those rooms or 
>> requiring the entire system to use metallic pipe would be
> overburdensome.
>> 
>> Supplement 3:
>> (8)* Sprinklers shall not be required to be installed within 
>> electrical equipment, mechanical equipment, or air handling units not 
>> intended for occupancy.
>> A.8.1.1(8) Equipment having access for routine maintenance should not 
>> be considered as intended for occupancy.
>> Clarifies that some electrical equipment is large enough to be 
>> accessed by man doors. In these instances, where this equipment is not
> 
>> occupied but rather accessed for maintenance, sprinklers are not
> required.
>> 
>> So, my three questions now are: 
>> 1. do I need sprinklers in the mechanical room that is 750 sqf?
>> 2. what code identifies the mechanical room as OH1?
>> 3. if I do need sprinklers, can I design the OH1 area off the cross 
>> main that feeds the light hazard areas (using only one riser feed)?
>> 
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> John Allen, CET, CFPS
>> President
>> 
>> 
>> AFS: Allen Fire & Security
>> Your Safety is Our Success
>> Direct: 770.715.7261 | Office: 770.723.7280 Ext 2 | Fax: 678.894.4180
>> 
>> 
>>  Please consider the environment before printing this email This 
>> email contains proprietary and confidential material for the sole use 
>> of the intended recipient and is the sole property of AFS.  Any 
>> review, use, distribution or disclosure by others without the 
>> permission of the sender is strictly prohibited. If you are not the 
>> intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), 
>> please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of the
> message.
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sprinklerforum
>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>> On Behalf Of [email protected]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 8:56 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Light & OH1 Hazard From Same Riser
>> 
>> You are looking for permission?   How long could the possible
> scenarios in
>> that list be?   
>> 
>> There is no restriction or prohibition of designing systems of 
>> different densities off one riser.  It's common practice.  Calculate 
>> and prove it works and you're done.
>> 
>> Mechanical rooms contain rotating electrical equipment, some may 
>> contain natural gas or propane piping, or fuel oil, typically there's 
>> at least one or more boxes of filters since they go with the AC 
>> equipment, we will at some time probably have to consider the 
>> refrigerant being used on HVAC equipment as some of the "greener"
>> gases have flammability properties.  So HVAC mechanical rooms are not 
>> without hazards.  OH 1 is typical for anything bigger than an
> apartment closet mechanical room.
>> 
>> Craig L. Prahl
>> Fire Protection Group Lead
>> CH2MHILL
>> Lockwood Greene
>> 1500 International Drive
>> Spartanburg, SC  29303
>> Direct - 864.599.4102
>> Fax - 864.599.8439
>> CH2MHILL Extension  74102
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sprinklerforum
>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>> On Behalf Of Brad Casterline
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 6:14 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Light & OH1 Hazard From Same Riser
>> 
>> Apology accepted ;)
>> 
>> a real head-scratcher--- i thought of a few things, looked them up, 
>> and by golly they were not codes that allows you to design that way 
>> (the way we all do all systems that is)
>> 
>> i'm going home and let this bother me all night... thanks (i cant wait
> 
>> til tomorrow morning when i check my mail)
>> 
>> brad
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sprinklerforum
>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>> On Behalf Of Jack Carlson
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 4:51 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Light & OH1 Hazard From Same Riser
>> 
>> John,
>> 
>> You should not have an issue with the design as described.  Light and 
>> ordinary are commonly mixed, no separate supply main is necessary.
>> 
>> 
>> Jack W. Carlson, SET
>> Triple "A" Fire Protection
>> Office - 251.649.2034
>> Fax - 251.649.2037
>> Cell - 706.247.5050
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sprinklerforum
>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>> On Behalf Of John Allen, CET, CFPS
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 5:38 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Light & OH1 Hazard From Same Riser
>> 
>> I apologize for such a simple question, but I would greatly appreciate
> 
>> some
>> guidance: 
>> 
>> I have a 22,000 sqf light hazard office space with a 750 sqf 
>> mechanical room that I've identified as ordinary hazard 1.  The entire
> 
>> ceiling space is an open 14' concrete beams and roof deck, and the 
>> mechanical room is separated by sheetrock and self-closing doors.  The
> 
>> riser is in the mechanical room and I have 7 upright sprinkler heads 
>> fed off the cross main pipe feeding the light hazard office space.
>> What code allows me to design this way or must I create a separate
> riser feed for each hazard?
>> 
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> John Allen, CET, CFPS
>> President
>> 
>> 
>> AFS: Allen Fire & Security
>> Your Safety is Our Success
>> Direct: 770.715.7261 | Office: 770.723.7280 Ext 2 | Fax: 678.894.4180
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
>> er.org _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
>> er.org
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
>> er.org _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
>> er.org _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
>> er.org
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
>> er.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler
> .org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler
> .org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler
> .org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to